How does seller carry back work

However, not only was I surprised to see Attorney Rhatz offer a no-cost consultation, but he also kept it "real. He didn't want me to lose more money winning with him he didn't want me to spend so much money to retain him, that even if winning the case, I'd still be at a net negative dollar-loss.

He gave me his undivided attention, asked questions that showed he actually paid attention, and was very resourceful with directing me towards credible sources of jurisprudence. What's more, is that he didn't throw me out after 15 minutes, but rather stayed with me until he felt I was sufficiently informed with the material and answers to questions to send me along my way.

This man even read through all my notes and connected with me as a person. I also appreciated his aggressive, but civil, nature towards vanquishing the countering party. He is strategic, he is prepared to preempt the countering party's legal arguments by first calling them out himself, and sparks reassurance that he is sedulously and astutely on the case.

Obviously, I would recommend attorney R Andrew Rahtz for the aforementioned reasons, despite only meeting with him one time on an preliminary consultation. Melissa Keiper 22 Feb I wrote in to a law message board asking about a step in my case and Mr. Peter Westby replied with some sound advice. I emailed him to thank him for his advice and shared with him I was not being represented. He offered to meet with me to go over my case and possibly about representing me.

In our meeting he allowed me to give him all the details of my case and he spent a good amount of time offering advise and insight to the law pertaining to my situation. Westby was very patient and allowed me to ask multiple questions and was thorough in his answers.

Because I live 2 hours away and in a different county Tucson , and because my case will most likely go to trial and the cost of travel for him to represent me I am unable to retain Mr.

Westby as my attorney. However, if this were to be taking place in Phoenix I would hire him in a heartbeat. I appreciate his willingness to talk with me and spend his time assuring me about the steps i'll need to take in my case. He was very prompt in his reply to my question and then for scheduling a phone conference to go over a case he prob knew he wouldn't be able to take given the distance.

Lance Wallace 04 Jan I've worked with Pete Westby on a few matters over the years and I do recommend him and his firm. It is nice to talk and work directly with a principal of the firm who has both integrity and tons of experience.

David Hughes 08 Nov Westby was great and very knowledgeable and the staff was friendly and very responsive and kept me informed every step of the way John Rukavena 12 Oct Meet with Peter today and was very impressed.

I had a large tile job that was done improperly and was not sure if a lawsuit made economic sense. In real estate, a seller carry-back mortgage falls under the umbrella of owner financing. Owner financing, or seller financing, occurs when in lieu of getting a mortgage from a bank or lender to purchase the property, and the buyer contracts with the seller to buy a house.

Once the sale of the property goes through, the buyer is then responsible for making regular installment payments to the seller in exchange for equity. Generally, sellers tend to benefit from carry-back mortgages because owner-carried financing will attract a larger pool of potential buyers. These are factored using a process called amortization.

Usually, amortization ranges from 15 to 30 years long. Regardless of amortization terms, the deal needs to work for both buyer and seller. A maturity date is a date on which the entire principal balance must be repaid. This is normally when the amortization runs out. However, some lenders choose to utilitize a balloon payment. This is when a lump sum must be paid by a certain date. Seller carryback transactions typically include some form of balloon payments.

This is important because if often means that the entire remaining balance is due. Most home loans are secured by the property itself. This ensures the lender has recourse in case of default. However, there are times when a debt will be unsecured. Real estate financing, on the other hand, is secured. The deed of trust is pledged as collateral when you take out a mortgage.

In seller carryback transactions, the home is the collateral for the promissory note. Seller carryback financing is a great option for people who may not be able to qualify for a more traditional mortgage. There are two different perspectives to consider when weighing the pros and cons of seller carryback financing: the seller and the buyer.

We like to look at each individually, because they come with different considerations for each party. For the seller, this process can have many advantages. These include:.

A property being sold as rental still generates income. When they finance the sale, the income stream continues as ownership of the house slowly transfers to another party.

When using seller carryback financing, the IRS allows you to defer capital gains on the sale of the property. This reduces your taxable income, also reducing your tax bill to Uncle Sam. In comparison to bonds and annuities, the interest you receive from the promissory note in a seller carryback transaction is usually better.

When you compare a seller carryback arrangement with more traditional ways to mortgage a home, the seller is normally going to come out on top with their sales price.

While it may seem strange to see this in the positive category, when the property is the collateral in the deal, then any default on the promissory note means it just goes right back to you. Of course, there are a few downsides sellers must be aware of when it comes to seller carrybacks. If the property forecloses, the seller will have no recourse against the new buyer for the carryback loan fulfillment as a matter of law, and will lose what is owed under the seller carryback.

The greatest concern in the seller carryback loan is a default by the borrower buyer. Should a buyer in a seller carryback transaction default on the loan, the seller is forced to foreclose on the security if the buyer will not voluntarily cure the default. If the seller forecloses on the security and ends up with legal title to the secured property, evicting the buyer post foreclosure can be both expensive and time consuming.

Another potential seller carryback risk is if the buyer-owner makes alterations to the sold property after the purchase is final, and foreclosure happens prior to the repairs being completed. Repair costs could be in the tens of thousands of dollars, and may need to be completed prior to attempting to resell the property, to recover the value of the seller carryback in addition to the payoff value of a potential first secured position loan. There is also a significant seller carryback risk is when the loan payoff in full is due.

The buyer may make nondisclosure claims against the seller for the first time as a means to renegotiate the terms of the secured promissory note. These claims can center around undisclosed water intrusion issues, undisclosed foundation issues, and similar issues, where the buyer contends that such information was known by the seller well before close, and was material to the price and desirability of the property.